Examining the design of choice screens in the context of the Digital Markets Act

Case Studies

UX Innovation

The hardest part was designing an interface that treats all search engines fairly, without unintentionally favoring one over another.

Behrad Mirafshar
CEO
A portrait of Behrad Mirafshar with a short beard and curly hair, dressed in a suit jacket and shirt, gazing slightly to the side with a neutral expression. The image has a dark greenish tint, giving it a modern and professional tone

We conducted a pan-European UX study to validate design patterns for android choice screens

The goal was to provide behavioral insights to regulators and tech platforms to ensure that the design of choice screens empowers users to make informed, unbiased decisions.

Services
UX Innovation
MVP AI Build
Digital Transformation
Industry
Public Policy / EU Affairs
Client type
Nonprofit
Duration
6 month
We tested 7 interctive designs through both qualitative and quantitative research.
We provided actionable UX guidelines based on real user behaviour.

How can we design an interface that gives every browser a fair chance - not just the gatekeepers?

The Digital Markets Act mandates that dominant platforms must offer users a choice when selecting their default search engine or browser. But how that choice is presented makes all the difference.

Choice screen design often privileges the gatekeeper’s own browser

No standardized UX principles for implementing the legal mandate

Collaborative research and agile prototyping across 5 EU countries

What “fair” really looks like in practice, we designed a multi-phase research and prototyping process. We tested behavior, bias, and clarity across multiple EU countries, translating insights into practical design guidelines that reflect both user needs and policy goals.

Collaborative workshops

Explored 80+ design variations focusing on visual hierarchy, copy clarity, and neutral placement—ensuring no browser was inadvertently favored.

Iterative prototyping

Explored 80+ design variations focusing on visual hierarchy, copy clarity, and neutral placement—ensuring no browser was inadvertently favored.

User interviews & Testing:

Conducted 35 in-depth interviews across 5 EU member states to capture diverse perspectives on choice screen usability and fairness.

Quantitative preference testing

Tested over 1,400 variants of choice screen layouts with real users to identify which designs minimized bias and promoted clarity.

Synthesis & recommendations

Analyzed the data to develop actionable design guidelines, outlining the do’s and don’ts for creating interfaces that empower consumers and support fair competition.

A UX framework that supports regulatory goals and empowers real consumer choice

Behavior-informed design guidelines

A playbook for building interfaces that promote equality across browser options backed by real user data.

Improved clarity and neutrality

Designs that reduce cognitive load, eliminate manipulative patterns, and make choices easier to understand.

Trusted by regulators and consumer advocates

BEUC used our work to inform key policy discussions and push for ethical UX standards in EU-wide implementation.

Evaluating vendors for your next initiative? We'll prototype it while you decide.

Your shortlist sends proposals. We send a working prototype. You decide who gets the contract.

Book a Consultation Call
Learn more